T3B 18650 netlist explicit grammar#
Tier-3B explicit-netlist battery grammar benchmark with variable cell count and direct interconnect editing.
See Grammar Problem Catalog for the grammar family index.
Quick Facts#
Field |
Value |
|---|---|
Problem ID |
|
Problem Family |
grammar |
Implementation |
|
Capabilities |
|
Study Suitability |
none |
Tags |
|
Taxonomy#
- Formulation
discrete_grammar
- Convexity
not_applicable
- Design Variable Type
mixed
- Is Dynamic
no
- Orientation
engineering_practical
- Feasibility Ratio Hint
0.03
- Objective Mode
multi
- Constraint Nature
hard
- Bounds Summary
explicit graph-netlist topology with variable active-cell count
- Tags
grammar,battery,tiered,tier-3b,explicit-netlist,graph-netlist
Benchmark Contract#
- Benchmark Question
How well do grammar methods synthesize explicit battery netlists when structure and wiring are first-class design decisions?
- Physically Modeled
Explicit cells, terminals, and interconnects; Shared explicit-circuit validation and discharge simulation; Grid-based pack layout summary and a steady-state thermal proxy
- Deliberate Surrogates
The grammar representation is explicit-netlist rather than pose-native; Thermal behavior remains a low-order proxy layered on top of the explicit circuit backend
- Representation Mode
explicit_netlist- Default Evaluation Mode
explicit_circuit- Supported Evaluation Modes
explicit_circuit,hybrid_thermal- Validation Scope
Explicit-circuit consistency checks
- Solver Role
grammar benchmark; no packaged optimizer
Statement#
Tier 3 adds explicit topology/wiring freedom and variable active-cell count to the pose-aware layout space. Designers can add/remove/move cells and edit interconnects directly in the explicit battery graph.
This rung introduces meaningful electrical-topology variability beyond fixed rectangular assumptions.
The grammar operates directly on explicit cells and interconnects. Topology quality is not only about cell count; stage balance matters. If n_i is stage population:
P_eq = min_i(n_i)
C_pack ~= P_eq * C_cell
I_limit ~= P_eq * C_cell * C_rate_max
This creates constructive pressure for balanced stage populations while still allowing open-ended wiring edits.
Problem Shape#
Field |
Value |
|---|---|
State Type |
BatteryCircuitState |
Initial Transition Count |
31 |
Initial Rule Names |
|
Manifest Parameters#
Key |
Value |
|---|---|
evaluation_mode |
explicit_circuit |
max_cell_count |
24 |
max_depth_mm |
500 |
max_height_mm |
250 |
max_width_mm |
500 |
minimum_capacity_ah |
10 |
minimum_current_a |
60 |
target_voltage_v |
14.8 |
voltage_tolerance_v |
0.1 |
Initial Transition Summary#
Rule Name |
Transition Count |
|---|---|
add_cell |
21 |
add_connection |
1 |
move_cell |
7 |
set_pack_terminals |
2 |
Library Interface#
initial_state()enumerate_transitions(state)enumerate_next_states(state)evaluate(state)